Veena Sriram, Stephanie M Topp, Marta Schaaf, Arima Mishra, Walter Flores, Subramania Raju Rajasulochana, Kerry Scott, 10 best resources on power in health policy and systems in low- and middle-income countries, Health Policy and Planning, Volume 33, Issue 4, May 2018, Pages 611–621
Power is a critical concept to understand and transform health policy and systems. Power manifests implicitly or explicitly at multiple levels—local, national and global—and is present at each actor interface, therefore shaping all actions, processes and outcomes. Analysing and engaging with power has important potential for improving our understanding of the underlying causes of inequity, and our ability to promote transparency, accountability and fairness. However, the study and analysis of the role of power in health policy and systems, particularly in the context of low- and middle-income countries, has been lacking.
In order to facilitate greater engagement with the concept of power among researchers and practitioners in the health systems and policy realm, we share a broad overview of the concept of power, and list 10 excellent resources on power in health policy and systems in low- and middle-income countries, covering exemplary frameworks, commentaries and empirical work. We undertook a two-stage process to identify these resources. First, we conducted a collaborative exercise involving crowdsourcing and participatory validation, resulting in 24 proposed articles. Second, we conducted a structured literature review in four phases, resulting in 38 articles reviewed.
We present the 10 selected resources in the following categories to bring out key facets of the literature on power and health policy and systems:
- Resources that provide an overarching conceptual exploration into how power shapes health policy and systems, and how to investigate it; and
- Examples of strong empirical work on power and health policy and systems research representing various levels of analyses, geographic regions and conceptual understandings of power.
We conclude with a brief discussion of key gaps in the literature, and suggestions for additional methodological approaches to study power.